<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Extended Discussion</title>
		<link>http://team287.forummotion.com/extended-discussion-f14/-t1.htm</link>
		<description>Have in-depth discussions and debates on a variety of specific topics.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:42:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>To be or...</title>
			<link>http://team287.forummotion.com/extended-discussion-f14/to-be-or-t150.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Ex-Member</dc:creator>
			<description>Not to be. That is the question.



And really, that's what I'm asking.



These days, we see &quot;stereotypes&quot;, &quot;victims&quot; and &quot;bullies&quot; all around. Unlike the masses who shrug it off, I am willing to admit to my cruel and deceptive self. After all, I'm only human.



However, according to such masses, acceptance of one's self (one's bad self, in this case) is wrong. How, may I ask, is it wrong? Isn't acceptance itself a human value we created? Various sources  ...</description>
			<category>Extended Discussion</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:42:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://team287.forummotion.com/extended-discussion-f14/to-be-or-t150.htm#2160</comments>
			<guid>http://team287.forummotion.com/extended-discussion-f14/to-be-or-t150.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Science fiction in school</title>
			<link>http://team287.forummotion.com/extended-discussion-f14/science-fiction-in-school-t124.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>haris &quot;dinodefender</dc:creator>
			<description>We need more science fiction in our english classes. I mean literature, like Isaac Asmiov,Ray Bradbury, Orson Scott Card, Arthur C. Clarke. Robert A. Heinlen, and H.G. Wells with Julius Verne. There is too much focus on Greek and Roman literature,also Shakspere.

We should try to get more sci-fi into the ciriculum. Who knows the state might put it into their regents and surprise us for we focused on the Illiad, Odepheius Rex, and Romeo and Juliet. Now these are all good but we need to prepare  ...</description>
			<category>Extended Discussion</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:39:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://team287.forummotion.com/extended-discussion-f14/science-fiction-in-school-t124.htm#2083</comments>
			<guid>http://team287.forummotion.com/extended-discussion-f14/science-fiction-in-school-t124.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>